Pass4sure 250-265 real question bank

250-265 certification examination instruction got to be this smooth.

250-265 test questions and answers | 250-265 Q&A | 250-265 bootcamp | 250-265 pdf download | 250-265 practice exam -

250-265 - Data Protection Administration for UNIX using NetBackup 6.5 - Dump Information

Vendor : Symantec
Exam Code : 250-265
Exam Name : Data Protection Administration for UNIX using NetBackup 6.5
Questions and Answers : 299 Q & A
Updated On : January 9, 2018
PDF Download Mirror : 250-265 Brain Dump
Get Full Version : Pass4sure 250-265 Full Version

Exactly same 250-265 questions as in real test, WTF!

Quality and Value for the 250-265 Exam : Practice Exams for Symantec 250-265 are written to the highest standards of technical accuracy, using only certified subject matter experts and published authors for development.

100% Guarantee to Pass Your 250-265 Exam : If you do not pass the Symantec 250-265 exam using our testing engine, we will give you a FULL REFUND of your purchasing fee.

Downloadable, Interactive 250-265 Testing engines : Our Symantec 250-265 Preparation Material provides you everything you will need to take Symantec 250-265 examination. Details are researched and produced by Symantec Certification Experts who are constantly using industry experience to produce precise, and logical.

- Comprehensive questions and answers about 250-265 exam - 250-265 exam questions accompanied by exhibits - Verified Answers by Experts and almost 100% correct - 250-265 exam questions updated on regular basis - 250-265 exam preparation is in multiple-choice questions (MCQs). - Tested by multiple times before publishing - Try free 250-265 exam demo before you decide to buy it in Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for all exams on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for All Orders

250-265 vce, Free 250-265 vce, Download Free 250-265 dumps, Free 250-265 braindumps, pass4sure 250-265, 250-265 practice test, 250-265 practice exam, 250-265, 250-265 real questions, 250-265 actual test, 250-265 PDF download, Pass4sure 250-265 Download, 250-265 help, 250-265 examcollection, Passleader 250-265, exam-labs 250-265, Justcertify 250-265, certqueen 250-265, 250-265 testking

Passing 250-265 exam is just click away!

I appreciate the struggles made in developing the examination simulator. it's miles excellent. i passed my 250-265 examspecifically with questions and solutions supplied by way of crew

actual 250-265 take a look at questions! i used to be not expecting such shortcut.

I certainly asked it, honed for a week, then went in and surpassed the exam with 89% marks. that is the issue that the proper examination arrangement ought to be much like for each person! I got to be 250-265 affirmed accomplice attributable to this web page. they've an excellent accumulation of and examination association property and this time their stuff is exactly as super. The inquiries are valid, and the examination simulator works best. No troubles identified. I suggested Q&A Steadfast!!

Is there a person who surpassed 250-265 examination?

I surpassed the 250-265 exam 3 days lower back, I used dumps for getting ready and i should correctly whole the examination with a high score of 98%. I used it for over per week, memorized all questions and their solutions, so it have become smooth for me to mark the proper solutions in the course of the stay examination. I thank the group for supporting me with any such incredible schooling cloth and granting success.

you know the satisfactory and fastest way to clear 250-265 exam? I were given it.

I cleared all the 250-265 exams effortlessly. This internet site proved very useful in clearing the checks as well as knowledge the principles. All questions are explanined thoroughly.

What study guide do I need to prepare to pass 250-265 exam?

killexams! massive way to you. remaining month when i was too much concerned approximately my 250-265 exam this website help me loads for scoring high. As each person is aware of that 250-265 certification is an excessive amount of tough but for me it was no longer an excessive amount of tough, as I had 250-265 material in my hand. After experiencing such reliable cloth I counseled to all the students to incline closer to the first-rate academic offerings of this site on your coaching. My properly needs are with you involved in your 250-265 certificate.

How many days required for 250-265 preparation?

To ensure the achievement in the 250-265 examination, I sought assistance from the I selected it for numerous motives: their evaluation on the 250-265 examination concepts and regulations turned into excellent, the material is truely consumer pleasant, first rate first-rate and very resourceful. most importantly, Dumps removed all the problems on the associated topics. Your fabric furnished generous contribution to my education and enabled me to be successful. i can firmly country that it helped me obtain my success.

Do not forget to read these real test questions for 250-265 exam.

i'm over the moon to mention that I passed the 250-265 examination with 92% rating. Questions & answersnotes made the whole factor greatly easy and clean for me! maintain up the notable paintings. inside the wake of perusing your direction notes and a bit of practice structure examination simulator, i used to be efficiently geared up to skip the 250-265 exam. really, your route notes absolutely supported up my fact. some subjects like teacher communiqueand Presentation abilities are carried out very nicely.

Unbelieveable performance of 250-265 question bank and study guide.

i have visible numerous matters publicized adage utilize this and rating the excellent but your items have beencompletely exquisite as contrasted with others. i'm able to go back soon to purchase extra take a look at aids. I without a doubt wanted to mention a debt of gratitude is in order concerning your exceptional 250-265 look at manual. I took the examination this week and finished soundly. not anything had taught me the thoughts the manner Questions & answers did. I solved ninety five% questions.

I need braindumps of 250-265 exam.

when I had taken the decision for going to the exam then I got an amazing support for my education from the which gave me the realness and reliable practice 250-265 prep classes for the identical. right here, I additionally got the opportunity to get myself checked before feeling assured of appearing properly inside the way of the preparing for 250-265 and that was a pleasant component which made me perfect equipped for the exam which I scored well. thanks to such things from the killexams.

Very hard 250-265 exam questions asked inside the examination. is an accurate indicator for a students and customers functionality to paintings and take a look at for the 250-265 exam. it is an correct indication in their potential, in particular with tests taken shortly before taking off their academic have a look at for the 250-265 examination. offers a reliable updated. The 250-265 tests provide a radical image of candidates potential and capabilities.

See more Symantec dumps

ST0-119 | 250-240 | ST0-114 | 250-315 | ST0-090 | 250-401 | ST0-074 | ASC-029 | 850-001 | 250-503 | 250-365 | ST0-135 | ST0-304 | ST0-12X | ST0-093 | 250-400 | ST0-10X | ST0-029 | 250-512 | ASC-099 | ASC-094 | 250-265 | ST0-097 | ST0-085 | 250-255 | ST0-306 | ST0-130 | ST0-250 | ST0-200 | 250-406 | 250-622 | ST0-058 | ST0-237 | 250-403 | 250-371 | 250-351 | ST0-057 | 250-722 | 250-510 | ASC-090 | ST0-151 | ST0-066 | ST0-086 | 250-271 | ST0-025 | 250-309 | 250-421 | 250-505 | 250-924 | 250-270 |

Latest Exams added on bigdiscountsales

1Z0-453 | 210-250 | 300-210 | 500-205 | 500-210 | 70-765 | 9A0-409 | C2010-555 | C2090-136 | C9010-260 | C9010-262 | C9020-560 | C9020-568 | C9050-042 | C9050-548 | C9050-549 | C9510-819 | C9520-911 | C9520-923 | C9520-928 | C9520-929 | C9550-512 | CPIM-BSP | C_TADM70_73 | C_TB1200_92 | C_TBW60_74 | C_TPLM22_64 | C_TPLM50_95 | DNDNS-200 | DSDPS-200 | E20-562 | E20-624 | E_HANABW151 | E_HANAINS151 | JN0-1330 | JN0-346 | JN0-661 | MA0-104 | MB2-711 | NSE6 | OMG-OCRES-A300 | P5050-031 |

See more dumps on bigdiscountsales

101-01 | 000-858 | F50-526 | CAT-241 | 1Z1-514 | 000-M602 | 600-511 | M9560-727 | E20-475 | CSET | CCBA | P2020-795 | C2090-549 | 000-599 | 000-456 | C_SAPXIMP_20 | 000-223 | HP0-X02 | 000-714 | JN0-201 | 000-996 | HP2-B35 | 000-599 | C2140-047 | LOT-926 | M2020-615 | 8002 | MOS-W3C | 000-646 | M2020-645 | HP2-H33 | 000-210 | A00-240 | ISS-001 | JN0-130 | HP2-E46 | 70-533 | C_SAPXIMP_20 | MB3-214 | GED | 922-095 | 0B0-410 | HP0-781 | 1Z0-321 | 000-172 | 920-462 | 00M-238 | LOT-441 | 1Z0-043 | 510-309 |

250-265 Questions and Answers


You are performing a disaster recovery of a NetBackup master server to a new system. Another person has configured the system to run the NetBackup database recovery. The recovery is run and you receive the following error message: The following DR media could not be located in NetBackup database. Please insert the following media and run the volume configuration wizard or the vmupdate command to update the NetBackup database. HostMediaIDBarcode train1GBP847GBP847S1 You locate the barcode in NetBackup and find the media ID has been set to P847S1. All media IDs are in a similar format. The library has 200 tapes and you do not know how many DR tapes you need. What can you do to guarantee the tapes will be found?

  1. Note the slot number of GBP847S1, delete it and add it back in manually as media ID GBP847, and then run the recovery.
  2. Delete all of the tapes and set the Media ID generation rule, reinventory the library, and then run the recovery.
  3. Use robtest to mount the media and run the recovery manually.
  4. Use tpreq to mount the media and run the recovery manually.

Answer: B


During hot, online catalog recovery, the DR file is found to be corrupt or unavailable. What can you do to solve this problem?

  1. Add a touch file.
  2. Run import on catalog media.
  3. Import catalog image to disk.
  4. Run bprecover from the command line with additional switches.

Answer: B


You have recovered all of your NetBackup catalogs using the GUI, which has used the only two catalog backup tapes. The recovery has been successful. A number of backups have taken place and a catalog backup is run automatically. The catalog backup fails with an error code
96. You investigate and find that all of the tapes have been allocated. What is the cause of this error?

  1. The catalog recovery freezes the tapes.
  2. The catalog recovery suspends the tapes.
  3. The catalog recovery places them into a different volume pool.
  4. The catalog recovery expires the tape within Media Manager.

Answer: A


Due to a hardware failure, the NetBackup master server must be reinstalled on a new system. After this installation, what should be done to recover the NetBackup catalogs?

  1. Recover the NetBackup catalogs and then patch to the most current release update.
  2. Recover the NetBackup catalogs and then patch to the same release update previously installed.
  3. Patch to the most current release update and then recover the NetBackup catalogs.
  4. Patch to the same release update previously installed and then recover the catalogs.

Answer: D


A recovery of your NetBackup catalogs has failed. Which location contains a log of the recovery?

  1. /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/bprecover
  2. /usr/openv/db/log
  3. /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/user_ops/root/logs
  4. /usr/openv/logs (unified logs)

Answer: C


Which command can be run from the client to verify client-to-master host name resolution and configuration within NetBackup?

  1. bpclntcmd -pn
  2. bpclntcmd -ip
  3. bpclntcmd -client
  4. bpclntcmd -master

Answer: A


Which command on UNIX or Windows clients can you use to verify basic client-to-master server communications?

  1. nbdb_ping
  2. bpclient
  3. bpclntcmd
  4. vnetdcmd

Answer: C


A NetBackup administrator receives Status Code 58 Cant connect to client every time there is a backup attempt of the client named alpha. Which command can be used to help determine if the NetBackup client service is listening?

  1. bpclntcmd -hn alpha
  2. bpplclient -hn alpha
  3. bptestbpcd -client alpha
  4. bpclient -client alpha

Answer: C


Which commands can help resolve NetBackup network problems? (Choose three.)

  1. ping

  2. bpverify
  3. nbclntcmd
  4. nslookup
  5. bpclntcmd

Answer: A, D, E


Your NetBackup master server is named hostA and has an IP address of Which command do you run from a client to test reverse lookup?

  1. bpclntcmd -ip hostA
  2. bpclntcmd -hn hostA
  3. bpclntcmd -hn
  4. bpclntcmd -ip

Answer: D


A NetBackup administrator is getting Status Code 54: timed out connecting to client for all backups of a client. Which command can be used to help troubleshoot this problem?

  1. nbping
  2. bpverify
  3. bpclntcmd
  4. bpconnect

Answer: C


A NetBackup administrator receives Status Code 41: Network connection timed out for some backups of a client. Which parameters can be modified to help resolve this problem? (Choose two.)



Answer: C

Symantec 250-265 Exam (Data Protection Administration for UNIX using NetBackup 6.5) Detailed Information

Train. Certify. Succeed!
Validate technical knowledge and competency by becoming a Symantec Certified Specialist (SCS) based on your specific area of Symantec technology expertise. To achieve this level of certification, candidates must pass one proctored SCS exam based on a combination of Symantec training material, commonly referenced product documentation, and real-world job scenarios.
Certification News
Find out what’s new in the Symantec Certification Program.
Prepare for an Exam
View the list of available exams and see the exam details and recommended preparation for each exam.
Learn about new item types on SCS exams.
Certification Process
Learn about the Certification Testing Process to find out how to register for exams and view exam fees.
Or, register for an exam now.
Certification Documents and Policies
Certification Documents and Policies
Learn about the Symantec Testing Policies and exam security protocols prior to taking your exam.
Manage Your Credentials
Manage Your Credentials
Log in to CertTracker to view exam progress and publish your credentials.
Subject Matter Expert Central
Register for notifications and/or to participate in our certification exam development process. Help design, write, or beta test the next generation of Symantec Certification Exams.
Read some frequently asked questions about Symantec Education Services and find out how to get additional help.
Why Get Certified?
Did you know that Symantec certifications ranked #1 as the top product vendor cyber security certifications by salary in the IT Security Salary Survey (Certification Magazine, November 2015) and that 76% of candidates and recruiters verified that Symantec Certification was discussed as part of the hiring process? Certification can open the door to increased visibility, better opportunities and new jobs in your industry. In today’s highly competitive environment, certification differentiates you as a professional who is serious about applied learning, making you an asset to a prospective employer. Read about the benefits of certification.
Symantec Training
We provide a number of training options to suit your schedule, budget and experience. Online eLearning courses are provided to you at no cost while Virtual Academy and classroom training are provided to you at a reduced cost.
Gain a competitive edge
Close more business
Drive larger deals with improved knowledge
Smoother solution deployments
Differentiate yourself from the competition
Satisfy customer needs by selling the right solution
Achieve program membership status with access to more Partner Program benefits
Online eLearning
No cost eLearning that is available online exclusively to Symantec Partner Program members. Earning Symantec accreditations and authorizations may give you access to revenue enhancing and profitability programs. eLearning courses are organized into learning paths that prepare you to successfully complete the Symantec credentials:
Symantec Sales Expert (SSE)
Symantec Sales Expert Plus (SSE+)
Symantec Certified Specialist (SCS)
Virtual Academy
Online learning that recreates the traditional classroom experience via live webcasts, hands-on labs, on-demand modules and expert mentoring. Benefits include:
Less time out of the field
No travel costs
Attend any class in the world
Classroom training
Fee-based technical courses at Symantec locations around the world, offering the same content and in
What is the Symantec Certification Program?
The Symantec Certification Program provides rigorous, objective assessments of Symantec technical expertise through securely proctored, computer-based, multiple-choice exams (based on real-world job tasks). The program validates the skills and technical competencies necessary for Symantec professionals to efficiently implement, administer, and maintain their data protection, high availability, and security environments utilizing Symantec solutions.
Successful completion of the programs’ current requirements will result in the achievement and reward of either a Symantec Certified Specialist (SCS) or Symantec Certified Professional (SCP) certificate.
Who is the audience?
Symantec End Users, Customers, Employees, and Partners (optional). Although each product varies in complexity and depth, all certification exams are created specifically for customers and cover core elements measuring technical knowledge against factors such as installation, configuration, deployment, product management & administration, and day-to-day maintenance. While certification is optional for partners and employees, certification is not a requirement of the Symantec Partner Program and does not count toward program classification.
What is a Symantec Certified Specialist?
An End User, Customer, Employee, and/or Partner who has proven technical knowledge and competency by becoming Symantec certified based on their specific area of expertise with Symantec products.
What is a Symantec Certified Professional?
An End User, Customer, Employee, and/or Partner who has proven technical knowledge and competency by becoming Symantec certified based on their specific solution expertise with multiple Symantec products.
Is the Symantec Certification Program available worldwide?
Yes, it is a global certification program for IT professionals working with Symantec solutions worldwide.
What certifications are currently available?
Symantec offers Symantec Certified Specialist (SCS) and Symantec Certified Professional (SCP) certifications covering several different products and solutions by product versions. See more information on the currently available certifications.
Where can I find the individual certification requirements for each certification?
Certification requirements, sample exams, exam objectives, recommended training and registration is available for each certification and corresponding exam. Please click here for more information on Available Certifications.
What is the benefit of becoming Symantec Certified?
Symantec certified candidates and their companies have the ability to gain industry recognition, competitive differentiation, greater productivity & results, increased user community satisfaction, and a tangible measure of their education investment.
Did you know that 76% of candidates and recruiters verified that Symantec Certification was discussed as part of the hiring process? Certification can open the door to increased visibility, better opportunities and new jobs in your industry. In today’s highly competitive environment, certification differentiates you as a professional who is serious about applied learning, making you an asset to a prospective employer. Read about the benefits of Certification for an Individual and Employer.
Does Symantec End User Certification count toward Partner Program requirements and benefits?
End user certification does NOT count toward Partner Program requirements. To learn more view this FAQ sheet (PDF).
Is my Clearwell certification still valid?
See below for details to learn about the acquisition of Clearwell:
Is my PGP certification still valid?
See below for details to learn about the legacy acquisition of PGP:
How and where are the exams administered?
Are exams published on the same schedule worldwide?
How do I register and pay for a Symantec certification exam?
How much does it cost to take an exam?
What is the format of the exams?
How much time is allowed to take an exam?
How will I be notified that I have passed an exam?
How will Symantec be notified that I have passed an exam?
What score must I achieve to pass an exam?
Who sees my exam score(s)?
If I do not pass an exam, can I find out which questions I got wrong?
How many times can I take an exam, is there a waiting period, and is there a cost to retake an exam?
How can I find out what topics an exam will cover?
Are the exams based on current Symantec product versions?
How do I know what software release version an exam covers?
Are practice or sample exams available?
Why does Symantec list a range of questions for exams?
How are the exams developed?
How are passing scores established?
Training and Education
The exams are computer-based and delivered at Pearson VUE testing centers. Pearson VUE provides computer-based testing for information technology, academic, government and professional testing programs around the world. Pearson VUE provides a full suite of services from test development to data management, and delivers exams through the world’s most comprehensive and secure network of Test Center Locations in 175 countries. Pearson VUE is a business of Pearson (NYSE: PSO; LSE: PSON), the international media company, whose businesses include the Financial Times Group, Pearson Education and the Penguin Group.
Are exams published on the same schedule worldwide?
Exams will be available on the same schedule worldwide in English at Pearson VUE. Translations will be determined on a country-by-country basis.
How do I register and pay for a Symantec certification exam?
To register for a Symantec certification exam, login or create a Symantec CertTracker account. Exam fees are payable by credit card or by voucher. View the step-by-step instructions on how to register.
View the step-by-step instructions on how to purchase exam vouchers.
How much does it cost to take an exam?
The fee for a standard released Certification exam is $225 USD (or your country’s currency equivalent).
Symantec reserves the right to change exam fees at any time. Always check Pearson’s website to verify exams costs, schedules, and locations.
What is the format of the exams?
Exams are delivered in multiple-choice format, with each having approximately 65-100 questions. It’s common for the exams to contain exhibits/graphics. Exhibits/graphics are shown directly above the question.
How much time is allowed to take an exam?
Allotted exam time varies by exam length. It typically takes one minute to complete each exam question.
How will I be notified that I have passed an exam?
Pearson VUE provides you with instant results at the completion of your exam. A score report will be printed and given to you before you leave the testing center. Candidates are also able to view exam progress by logging into CertTracker.
How will Symantec be notified that I have passed an exam?
Symantec receives candidate exam results daily via file transfers from Pearson VUE to CertTracker Be sure you keep your personal information in your CertTracker profile up-to-date so that you receive proper credit for exams passed and certifications earned.
What score must I achieve to pass an exam?
Passing scores vary by exam. For more information on specific certifications in each category, please see the certification exam details within your selected product solution training path.
Who sees my exam score(s)?
You, Symantec, and your company (if you designate).
If I do not pass an exam, can I find out which questions I got wrong?
No. Symantec maintains this policy to ensure security over the exam questions.
How many times can I take an exam, is there a waiting period, and is there a cost to retake an exam?
If you do not pass an exam on your first attempt, you must wait at least 3 days (72 hours) before a second attempt. If you do not pass an exam on your second attempt, then you must wait at least 2 weeks (14 days) between each additional attempt. If you need to retake an exam that you have already passed in order to fulfill a certification track requirement, you may do so after 3 months. The same cost applies whether you take an exam once or many times.
How can I find out what topics an exam will cover?
Certification requirements, sample exams, exam objectives, recommended training and registration is available for each certification and corresponding exam. For more information on specific certifications in each category, please see the certification exam details within your selected product solution training path.
Are the exams based on current Symantec product versions?
Exams are developed for the current version of the Symantec product release at the time of development. Exams may be updated after significant new versions are released. New exams may not always correspond to the software release schedule.
How do I know what software release version an exam covers?
For more information on specific certifications in each category, please see the certification exam details within your selected product solution training path.
Are practice or sample exams available?
Sample exams are available. Each sample exam consists of multiple-choice items. Some items may have a supporting exhibit which you will be directed to view before answering the item. The sample exams are not timed, however, you should attempt to complete them as quickly as you can. Certification requirements, sample exams, exam objectives, study guides, recommended training, and registration is available for each certification and corresponding exam. For more information on specific certifications in each category, please see the certification exam details within your selected product solution training path.
Why does Symantec list a range of questions for exams?
Symantec regularly conducts statistical analyses of certification exam results for exam maintenance purposes. In doing so, Symantec publishes a range of questions per exam to account for “unscored” questions. In order to ensure the value of the Symantec certification program, Symantec routinely updates exams with new questions on an unannounced basis. Those new questions are initially delivered as “unscored” so that Symantec can evaluate the performance in the field/on the released exam. The “unscored” questions do not count towards your passing score and additional time is already incorporated into the total exam duration to answer these questions.
Symantec also regularly updates exam questions where the actual number of questions per exam may vary from time to time as these unannounced updates occur.
How are the exams developed?
Symantec end users, both internally and in the field, are studied to define the job performance requirements. The results determine the minimum level of competence required for the defined job performance and is tested in the exams. Symantec follows industry standards for “high stakes” exam development.
How are passing scores established?
Although it is intuitive to think that an appropriate passing score for an examination should be 70 or 75 percent correct based on personal experiences taking classroom tests, these arbitrary values may not reflect the performance level expected of the “minimally qualified candidate” given the difficulty of the test. For example, if the examination is very easy, a passing score of 70 may be too low. However, if the examination is very difficult, this same value may be too high.
Establishing passing scores requires the application of systematic procedures that consider the defined performance level definition of the “minimally qualified candidate” and the difficulty of the examination. Before the final passing scores are established, they are evaluated to ensure that the available validity evidence supports their use for the intended purpose of distinguishing the “minimally qualified candidates” from those who are not yet qualified. This systematic method is used to establish and maintain the fairness, validity and reliability of exams.
In order to ensure the value of the Symantec certification program, Symantec routinely updates exams with new questions. In these cases the passing percentage could change per exam from time to time as these unannounced updates occur

Symantec 250-265

250-265 exam :: Article by ArticleForgeexam 250-265: records insurance policy Administration for UNIX the usage of NetBackup Are you aComputer / IT skilled?be part of Tek-information forums!
  • talk With other participants
  • Be Notified Of ResponsesTo Your Posts
  • keyword Search
  • One-click entry To YourFavorite forums
  • automated SignaturesOn Your Posts
  • best of All, or not it's Free!
  • join Us! *Tek-guidance's performance is dependent upon participants receiving electronic mail. by way of becoming a member of you are opting in to receive email.

    3301 exam secrets and techniques of passing examination in first effort '; $(document).capable(function() $('#embed_size, #embed_start').change(function() $size_embed = $('#embed_size').val().break up("x");; $read 250-265er_embed2 = $read".html", ".html?t=number"); $read 250-265er_embed2 = $read 250-265er_embed2.replace("width", $size_embed[0]); $read 250-265er_embed2 = $read 250-265er_embed2.change("top", $size_embed[1]); $read 250-265er_embed2 = $read 250-265er_embed2.substitute("quantity", $('#embed_start').val() ); $("#embed_text").val($read 250-265er_embed2); ); );
    course+time table+and+read 250-265ings_LDA150_ABT150_Spring2015_Apr17th
    Unformatted text preview: LDA one hundred fifty/ABT a hundred and fifty Introduction to GIS Instructors: Helen Dahlke and Yufang Jin TAs: Wan-Ru Yang (01), Gregory Burns (02), Ofurhe Igbinedion (03) Spring 2015 Lecture/Lab 4 units direction time table Week 1: Prof. Jin Tues Mar 31 Tues, Thurs Mar 31, Apr 2 Thurs Apr 2 Lec 1: direction Introduction & Overview (what's GIS? / essential concepts / web GIS facts Sources / brief history of GIS/ GIS fundamentals) read 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. 1: pp. 1-15; Ch. 11: p. 240 (Dissolve and Clip) “what is ArcGIS?” (pdf publication): Chapters 1, 2, 3 LAB 1: Getting all started with ArcGIS (Introduction to application, down load & manner records / Create Maps) read 250-265ing: “using ArcMap” (pdf publication): Chapters 1 and a couple of “using ArcCatalog” (pdf ebook): Chapters 1 and a couple of “Introduction to Map Design” (pdf document from Esri): pp. 1-6, 16-19 Lec 2: Coordinate techniques and Map Projections read 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. 2: pp. 20-39 Wade & Sommer: pp. 259-260 (projected vs. geographic coordinate techniques) “knowing Map Projections” (pdf publication): pp. 1-21, 24-28, 37, 72, eighty one, eighty five-86, 89-90, 93 “the use of ArcMap” (pdf e-book): p. 304 (On-the-Fly Projection) Week 2: Prof. Dahlke Tues Apr 7 Lec 3: Cartographic Map Design (Map Scale / Cartographic Map Design / statistics Visualization / color thought study 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. 2: p. 31 field 2.3, Ch. 9: pp. 170-191, Ch. 10: pp. 201-209 “Introduction to Map Design” (pdf document from Esri): pp. 1-19 (some assessment) Tues, Thurs Apr 7, 9 Thurs Apr 9 Week 3: Prof. Jin Tues Apr 14 Tues, Thurs Apr 14, Apr 16 LAB 2: Create a Soil Map and abstract analysis (Lab #three in the manual) analyzing: “the usage of ArcMap” (pdf ebook): pp. 38-39 (growing summary statistics) Lec 4: GIS information models (Vector & Raster information buildings / Vector / Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) / Vector records forms / basic Spatial analysis strategies: clip and dissolve) analyzing: Chang: Ch. three: pp. forty four-46, 57-58, Ch. four: pp. 68-77, Ch. 14: pp. 299-300 “Modeling Our World” (pdf booklet): Ch. 10 (TIN fashions) Lec 5: GIS information fashions: Raster analyzing: Chang: Ch. 4: pp. sixty eight-85, Ch. 12: pp. 250-265, Ch. 13: pp. 270-286 LAB three: Watersheds and Topographic evaluation (Lab #2 within the manual) page 1 LDA a hundred and fifty/ABT a hundred and fifty Introduction to GIS Instructors: Helen Dahlke and Yufang Jin TAs: Wan-Ru Yang (01), Gregory Burns (02), Ofurhe Igbinedion (03) Spring 2015 Lecture/Lab 4 units study 250-265ing: “the usage of Spatial Analyst” (pdf e-book): pp. 149-164 “the usage of 3D Analyst” pp. 77-79, pp. one hundred and one-106 Thurs Apr sixteen Lec 6: GIS Databases and Attribute Queries: Database administration systems (DBMS) / fundamental DBMS methods: desk be a part of, abstract desk/Attributes Queries study 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. 8: pp. 149-169; Ch. 10: pp. 210-222 Week four: Prof. Dahlke Thurs Apr 21 Lec 7: Vector data editing (developing a new characteristic category / Digitizing / enhancing in ArcMap / Introduction to Topology / the use of Topology for enhancing / Polygon characteristic class creation process / Spatial records Accuracy & Error / adding Database Attributes) read 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. three: pp. fifty five-fifty seven, Ch. 5: pp. 101-107, Ch. 7: pp. 128-142, Ch. 8: pp. a hundred and sixty-163 Wade & Sommer: pp. 267-268 (Topology) “the use of ArcMap” (pdf booklet): pp. 119-one hundred forty four “modifying in ArcMap” (pdf e-book): non-compulsory reference Tues, Thurs Apr 21, 23 Thurs Apr 23 Week 5: Prof. Jin Tues Apr 28 LAB 4: Create a Geodatabase from CAD enter / Georeferencing a scan (Lab #6 in the manual) study 250-265ing: “constructing Geodatabases” (pdf booklet): pp. 39-forty four, sixty three-sixty five “using ArcMap” (pdf e-book): pp. 305-310 (Georeferencing) Lec eight: Geodatabases (Geodatabases/ function courses /CAD file enter /images/ Georeferencing) read 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. 3: pp. fifty four-55 (3.four.3), Ch. 6: 111-121 “Modeling Our World” (pdf e-book): Ch. 4: pp. sixty one-seventy three “the usage of ArcMap” (pdf book) Lec 9: GPS (GPS history, GPS and its segments, GPS sign, Positioning principles, usual GPS signal and codes, GPS accuracy, Differential GPS, WAAS, RTK GPS) analyzing: Chang: Ch. 5: pp. 98-101, See path web site for notes. non-compulsory read 250-265ing: El-Rabbany: Chapter 1, Chapter 2 (2.1-2.3), Chapters four-7,10 Tues, Thurs Apr 28, 30 Thurs Apr 30 LAB 5: Introduction to GPS receivers and their use (GPS measurements, Marking and finding points, GPS for GIS records assortment) (Lab #4 in the manual) Lec 10: Midterm assessment Ch. 12: pp. 250-265 (evaluate) Week 6: Prof. Dahlke Tues may additionally 5 Lec eleven:. Spatial interpolation ideas study 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. 15, pp.316-335 web page 2 LDA a hundred and fifty/ABT one hundred fifty Introduction to GIS Instructors: Helen Dahlke and Yufang Jin TAs: Wan-Ru Yang (01), Gregory Burns (02), Ofurhe Igbinedion (03) Spring 2015 Lecture/Lab 4 units not obligatory analyzing: El-Rabbany: Chapter 2 (sections 2.4 – 2.6), Chapter 11 Tues, Thurs may additionally 5, 7 Thurs might also 7 Week 7: Prof. Jin Tues may additionally 12 Tues, Thurs might also 12, 14 Thurs can also 14 LAB 6: GPS for GIS and Interpolation techniques (Lab #5 within the guide) Midterm exam in classification (covers cloth in Lectures 1-9 & Labs 1-5) (convey: UCD2000 Scantron, eight.5"x7" Blue booklet, non-graphing calculator; no mobile phones) Lec 12: remote Sensing (Aerial images & satellite imagery) study 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. 4: pp. 73-75 (4.2.2), 75-seventy six (4.2.5), Ch. 5: p. 97 Wade & Sommer: pp. 261-265 (faraway sensing) LAB 7: Create a Land cowl Map—Polygon feature classification and Topology read 250-265ing: “editing in ArcMap” (pdf book) Lec 13: Spatial evaluation (mannequin builder, overlay processing, classification / Map Algebra: conditional statements / Vector and raster evaluation for overlay and proximity analysis / aspect pattern analysis) study 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. 10 pp. 210-217, Ch. eleven pp. 224-243, Ch. 12: pp. 250-265 (overview), Ch. 18: pp. 391-402 “using ArcGIS Spatial Analyst” (pdf e-book): pp. 23-38, pp. 172-189 Week eight: Prof. Dahlke Tues may 19 Lec 14: network information buildings & Geocoding / GIS course analysis / Census facts model read 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. three: pp. 59-61, Ch. 5 p. ninety three (5.1.three), Ch. sixteen: pp. 345-359, Ch. 17: p. 367-383 “Modeling Our World” (pdf publication): Ch. eight: pp. 127-131 Tues, Thurs may also 19, 21 LAB 8: Raster-primarily based Suitability evaluation (Map Overlay) Thurs can also 21 Lec 15: Visualization suggestions / ArcScene / metropolis Engine / GoogleEarth study 250-265ing: Chang: Ch. 13: pp. 276-277 (13.2.5) “the use of 3D Analyst” (pdf booklet), pp. one hundred forty five-157, 181-197, 210 “using ArcScene” (pdf book) Week 9: Prof. Jin Tues can also 26 Lec 16: GIS/GPS applications: research projects by Prof. Upadhyaya and Prof. Greco Tues, Thurs may 26, 28 LAB 9: Census facts / Visualization & Map Animation the use of ArcScene and GoogleEarth Thurs may also 28 Lec 17: guest Lecture: Dr. Sean Hogan, GIS for Agriculture, UC ANR Informatics and Statewide program web page 3 LDA a hundred and fifty/ABT 150 Introduction to GIS Instructors: Helen Dahlke and Yufang Jin TAs: Wan-Ru Yang (01), Gregory Burns (02), Ofurhe Igbinedion (03) Spring 2015 Lecture/Lab 4 contraptions Week 10: Prof. Dahlke Tues Jun 2 Lec 18: visitor Lecture: Dr. James Thorne, urban Forestry, information middle for the atmosphere, UC Davis Tues, Thurs Jun 2, four LAB 10: GIS Automation/Programming ArcGIS with Python (optional added credit score) [Final exam study 250-265 questions posted to course web site] Thurs June 4 Lec 19: final examination assessment (final lecture) final examination Week: Tues Jun 9 final examination: 1:00 – three:00 PM (deliver: UCD2000 Scantron, 8.5"x7" Blue book, non-graphing calculator; no mobile phones) sun Jun 7 last exam study 250-265 Questions/evaluate Session (time and room TBA) Tues Jun 9 optional/further credit assignment: Lab 10 is due for ALL Sections (hand-to your lab before the examination) web page 4 ...View Full document

    STATE v. SLAGOSKI STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joshua SLAGOSKI, Defendant-Appellant.†
    No. 00-1586-CR.     decided: April 04, 2001 earlier than BROWN, P.J., and NETTESHEIM and SNYDER, JJ. On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the trigger changed into submitted on the briefs of Christopher W. Rose of Rose & Rose of Kenosha.  On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause became submitted on the short of Gregory M. Posner-Weber, assistant attorney frequent, and James E. Doyle, attorney accepted. Joshua Slagoski appeals from a judgment of conviction and from a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence amendment.   He contends that the trial court sentenced him on the basis of materially inaccurate suggestions, that the postconviction psychiatric comparison via a forensic psychiatrist is a brand new ingredient warranting sentence amendment, and that using pretrial competency and mental accountability critiques at sentencing violated Slagoski's Fifth and Sixth change rights.   we're satisfied that the trial court relied on correct information in selecting the sentence, and we cling that a postconviction, contradictory psychiatric opinion does not constitute a brand new factor for applications of sentence change.   finally, we cling that the trial court's consideration of pretrial psychiatric experiences did not violate Slagoski's constitutional appropriate to be free from compelled self-incrimination or his right to information.
    ¶ 2 within the early morning hours of April 22, 1999, eighteen-yr-ancient Slagoski become found in the bed room closet of N .M., his chum's mom.   Slagoski become dressed in N.M.'s apparel, was armed with knives and razor blades, and turned into carrying handcuffs and duct tape.1  He became charged with one count number of housebreaking  beneath wis. Stat. § 943.10(1)(a) (1999-2000) 2 and one count of burglary whereas armed with a deadly weapon below § 943.10(2)(b).
    ¶ 3 in conjunction with Slagoski's pleas of now not guilty and never guilty by reason of mental disorder or defect, the trial court docket ordered competency and mental responsibility examinations.   Dr. George Palermo, chosen with the aid of Slagoski, performed a intellectual responsibility examination of Slagoski on June 5, 1999.   Dr. Frederick Fosdal performed a intellectual responsibility examination of Slagoski on June 8, 1999.   each psychiatrists believed Slagoski changed into legally sane on the time of the charged crimes.   moreover, Palermo believed that Slagoski posed a “homicidal-suicidal possibility” because of his psychopathology.   each psychiatrists informed psychotherapy.
    ¶ 4 Thereafter, Slagoski changed his pleas to responsible and no contest to single counts of burglary and armed housebreaking.   right through her sentencing argument, the prosecutor integrated the findings of both psychiatrists to set up Slagoski's future dangerousness.   She then drew comparisons between Slagoski's habits and sure behavioral characteristics observed by means of intellectual fitness experts in some serial killers.3
     ¶ 5 The trial courtroom stated its belief that although Slagoski shared certain features with some serial killers, “that does not make him the reincarnation of Jeffrey Dahmer.”   The trial courtroom believed that the reports of Palermo and Fosdal showed that Slagoski had certain intellectual fitness issues that multiplied his risk of future dangerousness.   It sentenced Slagoski to a twenty-5 yr time period of incarceration and a consecutive ten-yr time period of probation.   Slagoski brings this enchantment following the trial court's denial of his action for sentence modification.
    ¶ 6 We first address Slagoski's competition that he changed into sentenced on the groundwork of inaccurate information.   In aid, he offers the affidavit of an additional psychiatrist, Dr. Basil Jackson, during which the doctor expresses his perception that the pretrial examinations provided an “inadequate basis for coming to diagnostic and prognostic opinions” helpful at sentencing.   Jackson carried out a postconviction examination of Slagoski to check future dangerousness and concluded that he changed into not a sex wrongdoer, that he didn't require intercourse offender treatment, that the crime Slagoski was worried in was no longer sexually inspired, that he didn't healthy the profile of a serial killer, and that he changed into not a hazard to himself or others.   In different phrases, Jackson's conclusions concerning Slagoski's future dangerousness completely contradict the document of Palermo that he is usually a homicidal-suicidal chance.
     ¶ 7 Slagoski is proper that a defendant has a due procedure right “to be sentenced on the foundation of real and proper tips” pertaining to “the offense and the instances of its commission ․ and the defendant's personality, social cases and general pattern of conduct.”  State v. Perez, a hundred and seventy Wis.2d a hundred thirty, 138, a hundred and forty, 487 N.W.2nd 630 (Ct.App.1992) (citations unnoticed).   To establish a due technique violation, a defendant should demonstrate by way of clear and convincing facts not simplest that the trial court received inaccurate guidance, but additionally that the court docket relied on the incorrect advice in imposing sentence.   See State v. Johnson, 158 Wis.2d 458, 467 n. 4, 468, 463 N.W.second 352 (Ct.App.1990).   We also keep in mind that the focus of a competency examination is understated, searching for to investigate the defendant's mental means to keep in mind the proceedings and to assist information on the time of the proceedings.   See State ex rel. Haskins v. evade County court docket, sixty two Wis.second 250, 265, 214 N.W.2d 575 (1974).   in this instance, Slagoski argues that the competency contrast suggesting a prognosis of a homicidal-suicidal chance is beyond its relevant “understand and assist” scope, and therefore is materially inaccurate to a constitutional magnitude.   See united states v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443, 447, 92 S.Ct. 589, 30 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972) (sentencing choice turned into situated upon misinformation of a constitutional magnitude when it relied upon defendant's prior convictions that have been later held unconstitutional).
     ¶ eight We are not persuaded via this argument.   Slagoski cites no cases in support of his concept that a competency or mental responsibility examination is inaccurate if it consists of assistance involving future dangerousness.   Nor will we believe that it's outside the scope of such an examination to attract conclusions concerning the defendant's likelihood to engage in future dangerous acts.   We find illuminating the feedback of the Seventh Circuit in Fleenor v. Anderson, 171 F.3d 1096, 1101 (seventh Cir.1999):
     whereas prognosis and prognosis are conceptually different, the previous often follows from the latter.   If a person is clinically determined as having end-stage melanoma, the prognosis of a probable early dying follows.   in a similar way, someone diagnosed as having a everlasting intellectual disorder can also be anticipated to proceed the pattern of behavior that led to that analysis.
    we can talk about Fleenor once again after we consider Slagoski's Fifth and Sixth modification claims.   For now we with no trouble be aware that, in our view, Fleenor stands for the proposition that it's reasonable to anticipate that when a competency or NGI evaluation is conducted, the experts could render opinions regarding dangerousness. in fact, our assessment of clinical forensic literature adds aid to this view.   See, e.g., P. Kirkish & S. Sreenivasan, Neuropsychological assessment of Competency to stand Trial opinions:  a practical Conceptual model, 27 j. Am. Acad. Psychiatry & law a hundred and one, 102-03 (1999) (one prong for assessing competency is choice of prognosis for healing and mechanism for facilitating that technique).
    ¶ 9 We conclude that it is utterly within your budget that a intellectual competency examination designed to address a defendant's means to bear in mind the complaints and assist tips may also address issues of future dangerousness.   If the evaluation establishes dangerousness, a court docket may also fairly accept as true with it when gauging the need for public insurance plan.   this is wholly in step with Wisconsin legislation which requires the sentencing court to trust all valuable accessible advice relating the seriousness of the offense, the character of the culprit and the want for public protection.   See State v. Jones, 151 Wis.2d 488, 495, 444 N.W.second 760 (Ct.App.1989).   in this case,  Palermo formed an influence after his interview with Slagoski that he might commit an act of murder or suicide in the future.   This opinion was contained within the record which then became part of the trial courtroom checklist.   The trial court docket, when fashioning an acceptable sentence, became entitled, certainly even required, to trust this suggestions along with all other relevant proof when evaluating the factors for sentencing.   at the subsequent hearing on sentence modification, Slagoski provided a contradictory psychiatric opinion which he claimed rendered the prior opinions unsuitable or inaccurate.   however, the trial court docket turned into entitled to accept or push aside this information because it deemed appropriate.   we are convinced that Slagoski has did not prove, through clear and convincing proof, that the trial court acquired inaccurate advice and relied on it in imposing sentence.
     ¶ 10 Slagoski also contends that Jackson's postconviction report is a new element justifying sentence amendment.   even if facts constitute a new aspect is a question of legislations we evaluate de novo. State v. Michels, a hundred and fifty Wis.2nd ninety four, 97, 441 N.W.second 278 (Ct.App.1989).   a brand new ingredient is a fact or set of data particularly relevant to the imposition of sentence, however not favourite to the trial courtroom on the time of original sentencing, both since it was now not then in existence or since it become unknowingly ignored by using the parties.  Rosado v. State, 70 Wis.2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2nd 69 (1975).   the brand new element no longer best have to be up to now unknown, however ought to additionally strike at the very intention of the original sentence.  Michels, a hundred and fifty Wis.2d at ninety nine, 441 N.W.2d 278.
     ¶ eleven We do not agree that the existence of a contradictory psychiatric file establishes a brand new ingredient  requiring sentence amendment.   To the extent Jackson's conclusions contradict other stories in the record, we locate this with no trouble establishes that intellectual health professionals will occasionally disagree on matters of diagnosis and remedy.   moreover, as the State has brought up, determinations comparable to Jackson's had been a part of the listing as contained in a social employee's letter to the courtroom.four  We conclude hence that Jackson's postconviction psychiatric record isn't a new element justifying sentence modification.
    ¶ 12 We now consider Slagoski's competition that use of the pretrial psychiatric evaluations all through sentencing violated his Fifth change right to be free from compelled self-incrimination and his Sixth modification right to the advice of assistance.   Relying essentially on Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, one hundred and one S.Ct. 1866, sixty eight L.Ed.2nd 359 (1981), Slagoski argues his constitutional rights had been violated when, earlier than the pretrial examinations, he turned into now not suggested that he had the correct to remain silent and that his statements and the stories themselves could later be used against him all over the sentencing court cases.   We locate no such violations.
    ¶ 13 In Estelle, the Supreme court docket held that the privilege towards self-incrimination applies to courtroom-ordered pretrial psychiatric examinations, pointing out that:  “A criminal defendant, who neither initiates a  psychiatric contrast nor attempts to introduce any psychiatric evidence, can also no longer be compelled to reply to a psychiatrist if his statements can also be used against him at a capital sentencing proceeding.”  identity. at 468, one hundred and one S.Ct. 1866.   Any statements made by a defendant right through such an examination can handiest be used if the defendant has been suggested of his or her Miranda5 rights and knowingly waives them.  Estelle, 451 U.S. at 469, 101 S.Ct. 1866.   The court further held that the defendant has a Sixth amendment right to tips involving the decision of no matter if to cooperate, which requires that the lawyer obtain observe of the scope, nature and meant makes use of of the assessment.  identity. at 470-471, 101 S.Ct. 1866.   both amendments consequently require clear word to the defendant and advice regarding any psychiatric evaluation with the aid of the prosecution.  id. at 471, one zero one S.Ct. 1866.
    ¶ 14 The Supreme court has considering constrained its holdings in Estelle to the diverse information of the case.   In Buchanan v. Kentucky, 483 U.S. 402, 107 S.Ct. 2906, 97 L.Ed.second 336 (1987), the court discovered no Fifth or Sixth change violation as a result of defense assistance had joined in the State's action for the psychiatric examination and the defendant had asserted a mental popularity defense.  identity. at 424-425, 107 S.Ct. 2906.   After Buchanan, a defendant who initiates a psychiatric contrast and areas intellectual reputation in controversy waives the right to stay silent, but no longer the appropriate to word.   See Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680, 685, 109 S.Ct. 3146, 106 L.Ed.second 551 (1989);  Savino v. Murray, eighty two F.3d 593, 604 (4th Cir.1996);  see additionally State v. Worthington, 8 S.W.3d eighty three, ninety one-ninety two (Mo.1999) (concluding that Estelle does not bar use of psychiatric reviews where defendant requests intellectual repute contrast and asserts mental repute protection).
      ¶ 15 It is obvious that Slagoski waived his Fifth change rights when, through assistance, he initiated a psychiatric comparison and placed his intellectual condition into controversy by coming into pleas of not responsible and never guilty by reason of mental ailment or defect.   moreover, his own attorney requested Palermo for the psychiatric contrast.   as a result of Slagoski commenced the technique for the pretrial reviews and submitted to the examinations, he can't now declare that its use in sentencing compelled him to testify towards himself.
     ¶ sixteen The leading thrust of Slagoski's argument is that he deserved certain be aware that his evaluations may be used to establish future dangerousness at sentencing.   we're in contract with the road of situations that hang no such selected note is required beneath Estelle and its progeny.   See Savino, 82 F.3d at 604-05;  Fleenor, 171 F.3d at 1101-02.   In Savino, the Fourth Circuit held that there is no Fifth or Sixth modification violation the place defense assistance had precise note of the pretrial examinations.  Savino, 82 F.3d at 605.   When protection suggestions is utterly privy to the examinations, the charter doesn't require particular notification that a psychiatric evaluation might deliver a groundwork for a future dangerousness argument.  id.;  see additionally Woomer v. Aiken, 856 F.2d 677, 682 (4th Cir.1988) (noting that protection information should be mindful that requested psychiatric critiques may generate damaging outcomes and concluding “[i]t is of little moment that tips was now not primarily recommended that the comparison could supply a groundwork for addressing the difficulty of [the defendant's] future dangerousness considering the fact that [the doctor's] opinion on that challenge become predicated on  the equal assistance that become always gathered to evaluate [the defendant's] sanity.”).
    ¶ 17 eventually, the recent determination of the Seventh Circuit in Fleenor is also persuasive on the challenge.   In Fleenor, the defendant challenged the prosecutor's use-in rebuttal at sentencing-of a report generated by way of a psychiatrist who examined the defendant to investigate his sanity at the time of trial.  Fleenor, 171 F.3d at 1101.   The court docket construed Estelle as standing for the proposition that “it's … unconstitutional [under the Sixth Amendment] to position into facts the influence of a pretrial psychiatric examination the scope of which the legal professional become ignorant of.”  Fleenor, 171 F.3d at 1101.   The court docket reasoned, despite the fact, that protection advice turned into on useful notice of what a sanity examination could demonstrate:
    [Fleenor's] legal professional would have accepted that [the psychiatrist's] decision of Fleenor's mental competence would have implications for the problem of Fleenor's future dangerousness, a controversy certain to arise at the sentencing part of a capital case.   In these situations, the use of this evidence did not steer clear of the defendant's appropriate to counsel.
    id. at 1101-1102.
     ¶ 18 We observe this reasoning to the quick case.   We inquire even if the prognosis of dangerousness (a homicidal-suicidal chance) changed into to this point outdoor the scope of Palermo's usual evaluation that it may well have blindsided Slagoski's lawyer on the sentencing listening to.6  From the list, it is apparent that Slagoski's attorney become smartly aware about his customer's intellectual and behavioral considerations as revealed by means of his feedback when he selected to have Palermo behavior the pretrial assessment:  “You recognize [Palermo] became worried in the Dahmer case, and that i don't feel any doctor is extra geared up [than] him to contend with that sort of atrocious behavior sample.”   We haven't any doubt that here, as in Fleenor, the defense became fairly placed on observe that the scientific impressions of both medical doctors would be tremendously central to the concern of future dangerousness, a valid sentencing consideration.   for that reason, we hold the use of the pretrial psychiatric reports at the sentencing proceeding didn't violate Slagoski's correct to advice.
    ¶ 19 Given the data that Slagoski's usual pleas put his intellectual competency at issue and that Slagoski's legal professional consented to the two mental competency examinations and had exact be aware of them, we hang that using those reports all over sentencing did not violate his appropriate against self-incrimination.   because the prognosis of future dangerousness changed into in the scope of the competency examination, no Sixth change violation occurred.   The fashioned sentence became not in accordance with materially inaccurate tips and Jackson's report become now not a brand new component requiring sentence modification.
    Judgment and order affirmed.
    1.   In a statement to police, Slagoski admitted getting into N.M.'s bedroom on dissimilar activities and confessed to having fantasies about “slashing the throats of [N.M.] and her boyfriend and of killing them.”   He stated that he additionally had fantasies about “killing [N.M.] and skinning her and donning her dermis round and posing as her.”
    2.   All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1999-2000 version.
    three.   The prosecutor buttressed her argument by regarding a journal article that makes an attempt to foretell which mentally disturbed children may additionally become serial killers.   Bradley R. Johnson & Judith V. Becker, natural Born Killers:  The building of the Sexually Sadistic Serial Killer, 25 j. Am. Acad. Psychiatry & law 335 (1997).   this article, although, is not a part of the appellate list.
    four.   Jackson concluded that “Joshua is an emotionally disturbed younger man whose psychopathology is without delay linked to the theory of abandonment.”   His commission of the crime changed into the outcomes of his preoccupation “with union and fusion with [N.M.] which might limit her, i.e., as a surrogate, mom from ever abandoning him again.”   The social worker characterized his conduct as “a psychotic manifestation of his emotional need to merge along with his birth mother and his prior unspeakable reaction to his early life abandonment by using her.”
    5.   Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
    6.   The checklist contains an affidavit through the attorney who represented Slagoski at the common sentencing hearing.   In it, he states that he had no note that the examination would consist of issues aside from competence.   Nor did he have be aware that such counsel can be used at the sentencing proceeding.   The attorney then states that had he standard these records, he would have recommended Slagoski to say his Fifth change privilege.
    ¶ 1 BROWN, P.J.

    MEDFL5280 - Introduction to clinical anthropology educating Lectures followed by community work, together with group assignments.
    You have to take part in at least 80 % of the instructing to be allowed to take the examination. Attendance at lectures can be registered.
    Curriculum primary path booklet:
    Pool, R., & Geissler, W. 2005: clinical anthropology. McGraw-Hill education (UK).  (one hundred sixty pages)
    during this course, you'll create your own study 250-265ing record. depending on thematic and theoretical activity and relevance, make sure you opt for approximately 300 pages total study 250-265ing from here record of articles,
    Adams, V. 2005: Having a “protected start”: Conflicting views from Tibet. fitness take care of ladies overseas, 26: pp 821-851
    Adams, V. 2013: facts-primarily based international public health. In: Biehl, J., & Petryna, A. (Eds.). When americans come first: crucial stories in world health. Princeton institution Press, pp54-ninety.
    Andrews, T. J., Ybarra, V. and Matthews, L. L. 2013: For the Sake of our toddlers: Hispanic Immigrant and Migrant households’ Use of folks healing and Biomedicine. medical Anthropology Quarterly, 27: 385–413.
    Biehl, João Guilherme (2007) Pharmaceuticalization: AIDS remedy and world fitness Politics. Anthropological Quarterly eighty(four):1083-1126
    Biehl, J. & Petryna, P. 2013: vital world health. In Biehl, J. & Petryna, P. (eds): When people Come First: essential stories in global health. Princeton UP.
    Clarke, A. E., & Shim, J. 2011: Medicalization and biomedicalization revisited: Technoscience and transformations of fitness, disease and American medication. In handbook of the sociology of fitness, sickness, and curative (pp. 173-199). Springer ny
    Conrad, P. (2005). The shifting engines of medicalization. Journal of health and social habits, forty six(1), 3-14.
    Crane, J. 2010: opposed routine and placebo results: African scientists, HIV, and ethics in the ‘international health sciences’. Social studies of Science 40(6): 843-870.
    Farmer, P. 2004: The Anthropology of Structural Violence. present Anthropology forty five (three): 305-325
    Feierman, S. 2011: "When Physicians Meet: native scientific abilities and international Public goods" in Geissler, P.W and Catherine Molyneux (eds.): evidence, Ethos and scan - The Anthropology and background of clinical research in Africa. Oxford: Berghahn, pp 171-96.
    Hollen, C. Van. 2003:  Invoking Vali: Painful technologies of modern delivery in south India. medical Anthropology Quarterly, 17(1), 49-seventy seven.
    Holmes, S. 2013: Introduction: “value risking your lifestyles?” and Chapter 2: “we're fieldworkers: Embodied anthropology of migration”, in: clean Fruit, damaged bodies: Migrant Farmworkers within the u.s.. Berkeley: institution of California Press:
    Holmes, S. 2011: Structural Vulnerability and Hierarchies of Ethnicity and Citizenship on the Farm. medical Anthropology 30(4):pp 425-49.
    Hsu, E. 2008: medical pluralism. foreign Encyclopedia of Public health, pp 316-321
    Inhorn, M. C. 2004: center jap Masculinities within the Age of new Reproductive applied sciences: Male Infertility and Stigma in Egypt and Lebanon. clinical Anthropology Quarterly, 18: 162–182.
    Lachenal, G. 2013: The Dubai Stage of Public health. global health in Africa between previous and Future”. Tiers Monde, n°215, fifty three-71.
    Livingston, J. 2012: Chapter 2: The different cancer ward.  In: Improvising drugs: An African Oncology Ward in an rising cancer Epidemic. Durham: Duke school press, pp 1-28.
    Okwaro F & Geissler P.W. 2015: In/dependent collaborations: Perceptions and experiences of African scientists in transnational HIV research. medical Anthropology Quarterly, vol 29 (4): pp 492-511
    Langwick, S.2007: Devils, Parasites and Fierce Needles: healing and the politics of translation in southern Tanzania. Science, technologies and Human values, vol 32 (1), pp. 88-117.
    Lindskog, B. V. 2014: "natural calamities and ‘the big Migration’: Challenges to the Mongolian fitness equipment in ‘the Age of the Market’." international Public fitness 9(eight): 880-893.
    Kleinman, A. & Farmer, P. 1989: AIDS and Human struggling. Daedalus, 118 (2): pp 135-a hundred and sixty
    Meinert, L. 2014: Regimes of Homework in AIDS care: Questions of accountability and the creativeness of Lives in Uganda. In R. Prince & R. Marsland (eds): Making and unmaking public health in Africa: Ethnographic views . Ohio college Press, pp. 119-140.
    Petryna, A. 2004: organic Citizenship: The Science and Politics of Chernobyl-exposed Populations. Osiris, 2nd collection, Vol. 19, Landscapes of exposure: expertise and illness in up to date Environments, pp. 250-265.
    Prince, R. J. 2013: Introduction: Situating fitness and the general public in Africa. In: The making and unmaking of public fitness in Africa: ethnographic and historical perspectives. Athens: Ohio university Press pp 1-40.
    Prince, R.J. 2012: HIV and the moral economic system of Survival in an East African city. scientific Anthropology Quarterly 26(four):534-556.
    Redfield, P. 2012: “Bioexpectations: life applied sciences as Humanitarian items.” Public subculture 24:1: 157-184
    Samsky, A. 2012: Scientific sovereignty: how overseas drug donation programs reshape fitness, disease, and the state. Cultural Anthropology 27(2): pp 310-32
    Scheper‐Hughes, N., & Lock, M. M. 1987: The conscious body: A prolegomenon to future work in scientific anthropology. medical anthropology quarterly, 1(1), 6-forty one.
    Stan, S. 2012: Neither commodities nor presents: put up-socialist informal exchanges in the Romanian healthcare device. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18: 65–82.
    Storeng, okay. T. and A. Mishra 2014:  "Politics and practices of global fitness: crucial ethnographies of health methods." global Public health 9(8): 858-864.       
    Storeng, ok. T. 2014:  "The GAVI Alliance and the ‘Gates approach’ to health equipment strengthening." international Public fitness 9(8): 865-879.
    Van der Geest and S. Whyte 1995: The anthropology of pharmaceuticals: a biographical approach. Annual evaluate of Anthropology 25: pp 153-seventy eight
    Wendland, C. 2012: Animating Biomedicine’s moral Order: The crisis of practice in Malawian scientific practising. current Anthropology 53(6): 755-788.
    Whittaker, A. and A. Speier 2010: cycling distant places: Care, Commodification, and Stratification in go-Border Reproductive trip. clinical Anthropology Vol. 29 (four): pp 363-383


    Popular posts from this blog

    HP HPE2-E67 Dumps and Practice Tests with Real Questions

    Review HPE2-E68 real question and answers before you take test

    IBM M2010-727 Dumps and Practice Tests with Real Questions